Platform, configuration and devices · C0855
Does a cheaper tier mean weaker legal-minimum privacy or security?
In the pilot (v0.2.0, synthetic data)
Short answer
The pilot covers part of this. The rest is designed, not built. In the pilot: Privacy/security floors are locked invariants in the manifest validator and in effectiveCaps; tier/entitlement metering not built. REQ-3603 says Tier must not reduce legal-minimum privacy or security controls. Its acceptance check: feature matrix shows security controls identical across tiers.
This exists in the synthetic-data pilot only.
- Specification item
- REQ-3603
- Specification priority
- P0 (of P0 to P3)
- Tiers
- Small, Medium, Large
Status as of September 30, 2026. Version 0.2.0, synthetic data only. See what's built today. Not legal, medical or security advice.
Related answers
- How is the roughly 20-patient limit for the small tier enforced? Designed
- Will small clinics have to pay a support fee or reserve? Designed
- Does the software track which pricing tier a customer is on? Designed
See it in context: Tiers, entitlements and commercial features · Search the help center · Ask a question